A Sea Change for School Funding in America



Tags: school, funding, education, students, schools, student, formula, moving, multiple, system

In the United States, we are in a great transition period, moving from funding institutions to funding students. K-12 education funding, across multiple sectors, is moving closer to how we fund higher education in the United States. We are moving away from a system funded by local resources and driven by residential assignment to a system where funding is driven by parental choice and put in the child's rhetorical "backpack."

At Learning Matters an affiliate of PBS Newshour, I make the case in an online debate on school funding  that "money should follow students." I reprise the my point in the debate below, but go to read the debate to see what other education experts have to say.

In 2011, there are now 26 school voucher and tax credit programs in 15 states with close to $1 billion in school funding following students to schools. There are more than 2 million students enrolled in charter schools with more than 100 cities with 10 percent or more charter-school market share. In New Orleans, for example, 80 percent of students are enrolled in charter schools with money attached to the student and following the student to the school of choice.

Taking this even one step further, with the growth of digital learning and the need to customize education at all levels, we are beginning to see examples where not only will school funding follow students to the school, but to multiple education-service providers. In Utah, for example, the Statewide Online Education Program allows high school students to select courses from multiple high-quality course options and multiple course providers, while still being enrolled in their public high school. The money follows the kids to the course selection. In April 2011, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed into law Arizona Empowerment Accounts. Empowerment Accounts allow parents - in this case, parents of special-needs children - to remove their children from the public-school system and receive the money the state would have spent on them in an education savings account. Every quarter, the state deposits up to 90 percent of the base support level of state funding into a parent-controlled ESA. Parents can then use that money to pay for a variety of educational options including private-school tuition, private tutoring, special education services, homeschooling expenses, textbooks, and virtual education, enabling them to customize an education for their child's unique needs.

Traditional public school funding systems at the state and local level are also adapting to a "school funding portability" framework where state and local funding is attached to the students and given directly to the institution in which the child enrolls. More than 30 "school funding portability" funding systems are funding student through a student-based budgeting mechanism in cities like New York, Baltimore, Denver, Hartford and Cincinnati. In 2011, Rochester, Newark and Boston have moved to full weighted student formula systems where the money follows the child. Los Angeles Unified is moving from 100 pilot schools being funded based on per-pupil basis to all 800 schools funded based on where the student enrolls. In Louisiana, 7 school districts are piloting a student-based budgeting system, including the largest school district in the state, Jefferson Parish, with 50,000 students. New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Indiana have all recently changed their statewide school funding systems to a state formula where the money is attached to the child.

As Indiana's Tribune Star reported "Of all the sweeping legislative changes coming to K-12 education, from private-school vouchers to performance-based pay for teachers, the one that may have the most impact is tucked inside the 270-page budget bill. It changes the way schools are funded, following a new formula to divvy up nearly $13 billion in K-12 education dollars. The new formula follows the mantra that "money follows the child." As Representative Ed Clere, who sits on the House Education Committee explained "The new formula is a "sea change" from the past. We're no longer funding schools. We're funding students."

 

 

 

Not yet rated. Be the first:

<< Previous Article      Next Article >>


Comment

Name:

Eliazar said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

the letter was facautl and all the facts can be substantiated with documentation that is public record.I disagree that the Principals do not have a contract. If Mr. Gaida did not have some binding agreement of his employment, they would not have paid him salary and benefits as part of his separation agreement which by the way is another contract.Second – You can choose who you want to vote for. If you want four more years of tax increases and wasted tax dollars being spent, then by all means vote for Murtha, Weischedel, Zarnich. Since Mr. Singleton is being endorsed by them and included in that group you can bet ya he will vote their way. Or you can choose to vote for any of the other six candidates. The newsletter informed voters of how their tax dollars were wasted and who was responsible for wasting their money.Third – the school address is a public address. It is used by the organizations such as PTA, the unions, the coaches, the cheerleader organization, the staff, the Superintendent, the Principals, and yes even the board members. Besides, if anyone used their own address on the return envelop of the newsletter, everyone knows that CAW would place a target on their back as well as pick on their kids. More importantly is the content of the newsletter which states true facts.I agree stuffing church bulletins wasn’t professional. But hay their actions speak volumes. Finally, voters have a choice. You must choose five. More of the same, then vote for Murtha, Weischedel, Zarnich and Singleton. Change the board, then vote for Bauer, Acon, Ziegler, Brant, Bailey or Long.Well-loved.

11/6/2012 8:43:30 PM 

generic viagra said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

397YiS I am so grateful for your blog.Really thank you! Keep writing.

12/23/2012 1:11:19 PM 

buy viagra online said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

tzwZ2J Major thanks for the article post.Much thanks again. Want more.

1/10/2013 2:20:21 AM 

slim fast diet said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

A big thank you for your blog.Much thanks again. Great.

1/19/2013 6:44:43 AM 

social bookmark services said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

BvECzO Thanks-a-mundo for the blog article.Much thanks again. Cool.

1/18/2013 9:16:55 PM 

discount generic viagra said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

3NHt1l Great article.Really looking forward to read more.

1/27/2013 10:46:06 AM 

buy viagra said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

weMX8X Very good article post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on...

2/2/2013 8:08:51 PM 

buy imitrex generic said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

rfR885 A round of applause for your post. Want more.

2/14/2013 5:34:46 AM 

buy discount viagra online said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

8sT1mp Fantastic blog post. Much obliged.

3/2/2013 4:48:06 PM 

social bookmarks said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

AGg5sd Really enjoyed this article post.Really thank you! Much obliged.

3/13/2013 12:14:33 PM 

bookmarks said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

1tCC5i Thanks again for the blog. Awesome.

3/14/2013 8:49:45 PM 

generic viagra without a prescription said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Really appreciate you sharing this blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Much obliged.

3/15/2013 12:27:00 PM 

buy cipro said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

A big thank you for your post. Really Cool.

3/15/2013 10:48:02 AM 

buy generic cialis said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

I truly appreciate this blog.Really looking forward to read more.

3/15/2013 2:06:23 PM 

10mg levitra said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Thanks for the blog article.Thanks Again. Fantastic.

3/15/2013 3:46:42 PM