A Smarter Way to "Green" Innovation



Tags: government, business, innovation, reward, solyndra, energy, prizes, capitalism, taxpayers, million

In our op-ed on Forbes.com, Julian Morris and I argue that the federal government should end the practice of giving out risky loans in an attempt to spur innovation in the energy sector:

Government shouldn’t be in the business of selecting winners and losers in business at all. But if it is going to attempt to drive “green” innovation, it should use prizes to reward actual results and minimize corruption and corporate welfare. Prizes could be used to increase energy efficiency, cost-effectively convert solar energy to electricity, waste reduction efforts, and drive advancements on any number of environmental issues.  The type of crony capitalism that led taxpayers to waste over half-a-billion dollars on Solyndra needs to be eliminated. And rewarding proven success through prizes is a significantly better policy than subsidizing failure.

As we note in the op-ed, there are many reasons why this method is preferred. First, taxpayers would not be left paying for the mistakes of bad investments. With the demise of Solyndra, taxpayers are left on the hook for $535 million in bad investments. With a reward-based incentive, taxpayer money is not spent until a clear, concise, and audacious goal has been met.

Second, moving from a process-oriented grant program to an outcome-based reward program drives the kind of innovation that can only come from private actor competing against one another.

Companies do not compete through grant applications or lobbying to be one of the chosen few; all companies are welcome to participate. They don’t compete to make the case that they have a better idea – they demonstrate that they have the best idea. And, perhaps most important, the outcome-based investment produces research and development without spending a single dollar. The X Challenge may have only given the top prize to one company, but in the process they produced nine other finalists, seven of whom doubled the industry standard and a handful that have products that are marketable today.

This $1.4 million call to action prompted over 350 teams to pre-register and the results, announced October 11, were impressive. Seven of the final 10 teams doubled the standard oil recovery rate of 1,100 gallons per minute.  The winner, privately-held Elastec/American Marine of Illinois produced an oil recovery rate of nearly 4,700 gallons a minute. In a single year, without any federal funding, the X Prize had identified a problem, incentivized a solution, and produced a more efficient and cheaper technology that more than quadrupled the industry standard for cleaning oil spills.

Lastly, a reward system would drive a wedge between business and government that leads to the type of crony capitalism we’ve seen in the Solyndra scandal. Why can’t the government do this in lieu of risky and politically-motivated loan programs?  For one thing, it would require politicians to set policies that look beyond the horizon of the next election. Establishing a $100 million prize to the company that can develop a high-efficiency, cheap, clean, and industrial scale solar panel may take years, with no guarantee of sending home pork before their next election.

A policy that rewards outcomes will foster competition, incentivize innovation, and drive a wedge between business and government that leads to the type of crony capitalism that emerged after the demise of Solyndra. Government shouldn’t have a role in picking winners and losers in business. But if we can’t go that far, we can at a minimum insist that the government incentivize successful outcomes instead of hedging their bets on the market.

Not yet rated. Be the first:

<< Previous Article      Next Article >>


Comment

Name:

buy viagra online said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

xvSsJh Thanks again for the article.Really looking forward to read more. Fantastic.

12/23/2012 10:14:10 AM 

buy stendra said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

sG8qA0 Major thankies for the blog post.Really looking forward to read more. Will read on...

2/14/2013 12:35:08 AM 

buy imitrex generic said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Si9hWh I loved your article post.Much thanks again. Keep writing.

2/23/2013 10:15:19 PM 

clomid no prescription said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Fantastic article post.Thanks Again.

2/25/2013 7:48:37 AM 

http://1buyviagrahere.com/ said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

OwjXsN I appreciate you sharing this post.Really looking forward to read more. Cool.

3/3/2013 2:11:01 AM 

Cytotec cheap mexican said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

I truly appreciate this blog article.Thanks Again.

3/4/2013 2:47:13 PM 

buy cytotec india said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Thank you for your blog. Much obliged.

3/4/2013 4:05:12 PM 

buy discount viagra said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

A round of applause for your article. Much obliged.

3/5/2013 4:58:04 PM 

24option said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

I really enjoy the blog article.Much thanks again. Great.

3/5/2013 5:22:40 AM 

buy cheap cialis generic levitra viagra said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

I really liked your blog article.Really thank you! Will read on...

3/6/2013 7:03:33 AM 

Brehmandur said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Wonderfull post! Thank you!

3/6/2013 3:07:03 PM 

Brehmandur said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Wonderfull post! Thank you!

3/7/2013 1:19:42 AM 

adverse effect of norvasc said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Fantastic article.Thanks Again. Want more.

3/7/2013 1:28:24 PM 

seo company los angeles said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

wow, awesome post.Thanks Again. Awesome.

3/10/2013 4:41:14 AM 

surrogacy agencies said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

This is one awesome article post.Thanks Again. Want more.

3/10/2013 10:50:37 AM 

viagra online said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Really enjoyed this article post.Really thank you! Much obliged.

3/11/2013 2:45:39 PM 

buy viagra online said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Thanks so much for the article. Want more.

3/11/2013 2:45:41 PM 

cheap cialis online said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Im obliged for the blog article. Cool.

3/12/2013 8:26:44 PM 

cheap generic viagra online said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Looking forward to reading more. Great blog article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

3/12/2013 8:26:46 PM 

cheap generic imitrex online said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Awesome post. Really Cool.

3/12/2013 8:26:47 PM 

viagra online said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Awesome post.Really thank you!

3/13/2013 2:54:08 AM 

buy viagra pills said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

I really liked your blog post.Thanks Again. Awesome.

3/13/2013 2:54:11 AM 

social bookmarks said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

MaZD3S Very good post.Much thanks again. Awesome.

3/13/2013 1:13:22 PM 

buy cipro said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Thanks so much for the blog.

3/15/2013 9:44:30 AM 

generic viagra said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Thank you for your article.Thanks Again. Much obliged.

3/15/2013 11:23:03 AM 

generic cialis no prescription said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Hey, thanks for the blog. Great.

3/15/2013 1:02:02 PM 

Buy Levitra uk said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

I value the article.Really thank you! Fantastic.

3/15/2013 2:41:32 PM 

Buy Levitra online uk said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Major thanks for the blog post.Thanks Again. Want more.

3/15/2013 4:50:59 PM 

generic cialis no prescription said... Rating: 0   Vote +   Vote -  

Say, you got a nice post.Thanks Again. Really Cool.

3/16/2013 1:13:58 AM